Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Banner Left
Banner Right

Activists hoping for positive sodomy law judgement

A lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer/questioning and intersex (LGBTQI+) activist and a human rights lawyer say they are hoping for the High Court’s positive judgement on the constitutionality of the criminalisation of sodomy in Namibia.

The judgement is expected to be delivered on Friday.

Friedel Dausab, a gay Namibian man and activist, is challenging the compatibility of the offence of sodomy and related offences with his rights under Namibia’s Constitution.

In an interview by Linda Baumann under the Namibia Media Trust’s ‘Ask The Experts’ podcast earlier this month, lawyer John Nakuta said it is time to address some of the outdated common laws, including the sodomy law.

According to Nakuta, this case is essential, because common law glaringly discriminates against certain parties.

“The same sodomy law does not criminalise the same act between heterosexual persons,” he says.

The unwritten law, derived from Roman-Dutch law and inherited from South African law, criminalises consensual sex between consenting adult men.

Nakuta said when faced with a legal issue such as Dausab’s case, the court will determine if differentiation is made between people.

If so, the court must ask if this distinction is based on any of the grounds listed in Article 10(2) of the Constitution.

These grounds include sex, race, colour, ethnic origin, religion, creed, or social or economic status.

John Nakuta

Nakuta said Dausab is basing his case on discrimination on the ground of sex and not sexual orientation.

The latter is not listed as a ground in the Constitution.

Thereafter, the court will determine if the distinction invalidates or impairs the equal recognition or enjoyment of rights between people.
If so, it must determine whether the distinction is fair or unfair.

Nakuta said he is hopeful that the law would develop and become more progressive. He says the LGBTQI+ community should know it can still appeal to the Supreme Court.

“There are also international remedies that can be sought, such as approaching the Human Rights Committee of the United Nations,” he said.

“In terms of international human rights law, there is an obligation on the state to go all out to protect the human rights of all citizens,” he said.

If the state ignores the plight of the LGBTQI+ community, it can be held accountable.

Deyonce Naris, the national coordinator of the Transgender, Intersex, and Androgynous Movement of Namibia, said there has been backlash after court hearings on LGBTQI+ issues in recent years.

Following these verdicts, violent attacks against members of the LGBTQI+ community tend to escalate.

When reporting on this matter, the media should remain objective and ethical, she said.

In the past, some media outlets have used incorrect terms that could perpetuate misconceptions about the LGBTQI+ community.

Naris says one such misconception is that the LGBTQI+ community are looking for special rights, which is not the case.

Amnesty International has called on the Namibian authorities to protect LGBTQI+ people against harassment, violence, or discrimination.

“In recent weeks, Amnesty International has observed alarming rhetoric threatening LGBTQI+ persons in Namibia,” said Khanyo Farise, Amnesty International’s deputy regional director for eastern and southern Africa.

“Whatever the outcome of the High Court decision on 21 June, violence and discrimination against LGBTQI+ people have no place in Namibian society.

“The authorities should take decisive action to prevent human rights violations against LGBTQI+ persons and hold perpetrators accountable,” Farise said.

Stay informed with The Namibian – your source for credible journalism. Get in-depth reporting and opinions for only N$85 a month. Invest in journalism, invest in democracy –
Subscribe Now!

Latest News