Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Banner Left
Banner Right

Claims of white genocide ‘not real’, South African court rules

The treatment of South Africa’s white minority population has come under increased scrutiny.

A South African court has dismissed claims of a white genocide in the country as “clearly imagined” and “not real”, undermining comments made by US President Donald Trump and his adviser Elon Musk.

The ruling came as the court blocked a wealthy benefactor’s donation to white supremacist group Boerelegioen.

Grantland Michael Bray wanted to bequeath $2.1m ( £1.7m) to the group to help it “further its messages of racial hatred and separation”.

But the court ruled this request was invalid, vague and “contrary to public policy”.

Trump has referred to the “large-scale killing of farmers” in South Africa, while Musk has condemned what he said were “racist ownership laws” and previously condemned the “genocide of white people”.

Despite vowing to crack down on immigration, Trump has said that white South African farmers would be allowed to settle in the US as refugees because of the persecution he said they faced.

Musk was born and grew up in South Africa before moving to the US.

The court action was brought by Mr Gray’s four siblings, who are also trustees and beneficiaries of the family trust.

In it, they claimed that their brother had become “obsessed with the idea of an impending genocide of white people in South Africa” in the last 10 years of his life.

He died in March 2022.

Mr Gray, who was paralysed following an accident aged 26 while doing military service, had also become paranoid, believing the supposed “genocide” would occur soon.

“That idea was further fuelled by his already present racism and the online content that he was exposed to,” Judge Rosheni Allie summarised in a 15 February ruling that has just come to light.

Mr Gray first met members of the Boerelegioen in 2020 and allegedly gave them about $326,000 (£258,000) in gold coins to help fund their cause and gain membership of the racist group.

The Boerelegioen describes itself as a “civil defence movement that enables citizens to resist the promised slaughter of whites in RSA [Republic of South Africa] as well as the theft of their property”.

Mr Gray subsequently made the organisation a beneficiary to his estate, specifying that a portion of the money go towards the various training programmes the group ran.

But because there were three entities all bearing the Boerelegioen name, the court found that Mr Gray’s bequest made was “vague concerning which entity was the intended beneficiary” of his will.

“The only expression of the [Mr Gray’s] intention that is evident is the intention for the funds to be used for ‘training’ as well as [his] own assertions that he wanted the funds used to benefit an organisation which he deemed to be one which will exterminate every black person in South Africa and will be used to defend or ward off a white genocide, which is clearly imagined and not real,” Judge Allie said.

On the public policy issue, Mr Gray’s siblings contended that Boerelegioen wanted to use the funds to “further… its messages of racial hatred and separation”.

Boerelegioen says it simply provides security and training services to communities and does not exclude anyone on the basis of race, gender or religion.

Judge Allie ruled in favour of the siblings and ordered Boerelegioen to pay the costs in the court case.

Earlier this month, Trump signed an executive order freezing financial aid to the country over a new law allowing for land seizures by the South African government under certain circumstances.

The status of white South African farmers has long been a rallying cry on the right and far-right of American politics.

But despite numerous claims in the past of the systematic targeting of the country’s white Afrikaner minority group, local crime statistics figures paint a different picture.

South Africa does not release crime figures based on race but the latest figures revealed that 6,953 people were murdered in the country between October and December 2024.

Of these, 12 were killed in farm attacks. Of the 12, one was a farmer, while five were farm dwellers and four were employees, who are likely to have been black.

In contrast, 961 women were murdered alongside 273 children. – BBC

Stay informed with The Namibian – your source for credible journalism. Get in-depth reporting and opinions for only N$85 a month. Invest in journalism, invest in democracy –
Subscribe Now!

Latest News