Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Banner Left
Banner Right

James Hatuikulipi found not guilty on bribery, obstruction of justice charges

James Hatuikulipi

A key figure in the Fishrot fishing quotas fraud, corruption and racketeering case, James Hatuikulipi, has been found not guilty on a bribery charge he was facing in the Windhoek Magistrate’s Court.

Magistrate Kandiwapa Nembia acquitted Hatuikulipi (49) on counts of corruptly offering a bribe to an agent of the Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) and attempting to defeat or obstruct the course of justice.

Former police reservist Sakaria Kokule (51), who was charged with Hatuikulipi, was found guilty on both charges in a verdict delivered on Thursday last week.

The charges against Hatuikulipi and Kokule were based on allegations that they tried to bribe an ACC officer in January 2020, by offering him N$250 000 in an attempt to get him to hand evidence seized by the ACC to them.

The evidence, collected during the investigation of alleged corruption, fraud and other offences connected to the procurement and use of Namibian fishing quotas, consisted of bank cards issued to Hatuikulipi and a co-accused in the Fishrot case, Pius Mwatelulo, and also a handwritten document.

Hatuikulipi and Kokule were initially charged with a third accused, Jason Iyambo, who in November 2020 admitted guilt on a charge of attempting to defeat or obstruct the course of justice.

Iyambo was sentenced to an effective prison term of nine months after he admitted guilt.

After Iyambo did not testify as a state witness during the trial of Hatuikulipi and Kokule, Hatuikulipi’s defence lawyer, Gilroy Kasper, argued that without his testimony, there was only hearsay evidence against Hatuikulipi, and this meant the charges against him had not been proven and that he had to be found not guilty.

In a plea statement, Iyambo admitted that he offered to pay N$250 000 to an ACC officer, Junias Iipinge, on 20 January 2020, in exchange for two bank cards in Hatuikulipi’s name, two bank cards that were issued to Mwatelulo and a hand-written document titled ‘Total Allocation’.

Iyambo also said he used to help Hatuikulipi with some of his personal errands.

He stated that during a visit to Hatuikulipi, who was in custody at that stage, he informed Hatuikulipi about expenses that needed to be paid with regard to his farm. Hatuikulipi informed him that his bank cards had been taken by the ACC, and asked him if there was a way to get hold of the seized cards, Iyambo said in the plea statement.

Three state witnesses testified during Hatuikulipi and Kokule’s trial.

The two accused men elected not to testify in their own defence after the state’s case was concluded.

During the trial, Iipinge testified that he took part in a search of Hatuikulipi’s house on 13 December 2020. During the search, bank cards were seized by ACC investigators, he said.

According to Iipinge, he received a phone call from Kokule the next day. He said Kokule told him he had been approached by Iyambo, who said he had visited Hatuikulipi in custody and had been asked by him to approach Kokule to find a way to get the seized cards back.

Kasper argued that the only admissible evidence against Hatuikulipi was about the search of his house by ACC investigators.

The rest of the state’s evidence was based entirely on reports or allegations that Iyambo and Kokule made to Iipinge, and all of that evidence was hearsay and of no value to prove the charges against Hatuikulipi, Kasper added.

Kokule has to return to court on 29 October, when a presentence hearing is scheduled to take place.

He is being represented by defence lawyer Jermaine Muchali.

State advocate Ian Malumani is representing the prosecution.

Stay informed with The Namibian – your source for credible journalism. Get in-depth reporting and opinions for only N$85 a month. Invest in journalism, invest in democracy –
Subscribe Now!

Latest News