Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

No cookies to display.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

No cookies to display.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Banner Left
Banner Right

What about my rights? asks sacked NSHR monitor

What about my rights? asks sacked NSHR monitor

A DISMISSED human rights worker is taking the National Society for Human Rights (NSHR) to court for unfair dismissal and denying him freedom of speech.

Mathias Munango, who was employed as a “human rights monitor” in Kavango, said he was fired in September without a disciplinary hearing and that NSHR Director Phil ya Nangoloh based the summary dismissal on a February 2002 warning that he should not to speak to the media. But Ya Nangoloh, speaking to The Namibian, has defended Munango’s immediate dismissal, accusing his former employee of “fraudulent behaviour”, dishonesty and misuse of the company vehicle.”We feel that we followed the procedure.He did dishonest things and we won’t accept that.I cannot accept that and [let him continue to] work with us,” said Ya Nangoloh.Munango said the NSHR gave him a “final” warning in February 2002 after a reporter at The Namibian had called to alert him and verify assertions of human rights abuses by members of the security forces.Ya Nangoloh said Munango was “not denied” the right to speak to the media, but “should have consulted NSHR head office” in Windhoek because that was the organisation’s policy.According to Ya Nangoloh, head office suspected Munango had spoken to reporter Max Hamata after the story referred to an unnamed human rights activist.Munango said that Hamata had told him the reference was not to him as a monitor but to one of his other human rights sources.The former NSHR employee said he would provide information to the court showing that Ya Nangoloh “is just running the organisation like his private firm”.He said Ya Nangoloh merely called him in to the director’s office and called upon the administrative officer to voice accusations that Munango had dropped the phone in her ear and that he had misused and damaged the company vehicle.Ya Nangoloh said Munango claimed to be on sick leave while visiting a girlfriend.He also said Munango had turned from a trustworthy employee to a dishonest one by the time he was fired.”We have strict discipline, we cannot warn a person many times,” he said.The NSHR said it would defend the case, which is set down for the Labour Court this February.But Ya Nangoloh, speaking to The Namibian, has defended Munango’s immediate dismissal, accusing his former employee of “fraudulent behaviour”, dishonesty and misuse of the company vehicle. “We feel that we followed the procedure. He did dishonest things and we won’t accept that. I cannot accept that and [let him continue to] work with us,” said Ya Nangoloh. Munango said the NSHR gave him a “final” warning in February 2002 after a reporter at The Namibian had called to alert him and verify assertions of human rights abuses by members of the security forces. Ya Nangoloh said Munango was “not denied” the right to speak to the media, but “should have consulted NSHR head office” in Windhoek because that was the organisation’s policy. According to Ya Nangoloh, head office suspected Munango had spoken to reporter Max Hamata after the story referred to an unnamed human rights activist. Munango said that Hamata had told him the reference was not to him as a monitor but to one of his other human rights sources. The former NSHR employee said he would provide information to the court showing that Ya Nangoloh “is just running the organisation like his private firm”. He said Ya Nangoloh merely called him in to the director’s office and called upon the administrative officer to voice accusations that Munango had dropped the phone in her ear and that he had misused and damaged the company vehicle. Ya Nangoloh said Munango claimed to be on sick leave while visiting a girlfriend. He also said Munango had turned from a trustworthy employee to a dishonest one by the time he was fired. “We have strict discipline, we cannot warn a person many times,” he said. The NSHR said it would defend the case, which is set down for the Labour Court this February.

Stay informed with The Namibian – your source for credible journalism. Get in-depth reporting and opinions for only N$85 a month. Invest in journalism, invest in democracy –
Subscribe Now!

Latest News